Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to withhold $2bn in foreign aid

Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to withhold $2bn in foreign aid

The US Supreme Court has rejected a request by the Trump administration to withhold nearly $2bn (£1.6bn) in payments to foreign aid organisations for work they have already performed for the government.

On Wednesday, the top court upheld a lower court ruling ordering the administration to release the funds to contractors and grant recipients of the US Agency for International Development and the State Department.

Since taking office, President Donald Trump has cut numerous aid programmes and placed most USAID staff on leave or dismissed them.

Aid agencies argue these actions have jeopardised life-saving operations worldwide.

Last month District Judge Amir Ali had ordered the State Department and USAID to pay the bills to contractors for the work already done by midnight on 26 February.

As the deadline approached, the Trump administration sought an emergency relief from the Supreme Court, arguing it was impossible to process claims in an orderly fashion in such a short period of time.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a brief administrative stay, before the full court acted on President Trump’s request.

On Wednesday, the top court in a narrow 5-4 decision declined to halt the lower court order that required the Trump administration to release the payment.

The court said that Judge Ali’s deadline for the immediate payment had now passed, and the district court should “clarify what obligations” the administration must fulfil to comply the order.

Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented with the order.

“Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars?” Justice Alito wrote in a dissent joined by the three other conservative justices. “The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.”

The case began when two aid groups challenged Trump’s 90-day freeze on foreign assistance. Judge Ali initially paused the cuts while reviewing the case, later ordering payment for completed work after the government failed to comply.

Legal proceedings continue, with a district court hearing set for Thursday on contractors’ requests for extended relief.

The Trump administration, led by billionaire Elon Musk’s cost-cutting initiative, aims to shrink the federal workforce.

USAID cutbacks have already disrupted global aid efforts, freezing hundreds of programmes in dozens of countries.

The US, by far the world’s largest humanitarian aid provider, operates in over 60 countries, largely through contractors.

#Supreme #Court #rejects #Trump #bid #withhold #2bn #foreign #aid

Related post

Naomi Osaka calls Indian Wells loss to Camila Osorio the worst match she has ever played

Naomi Osaka calls Indian Wells loss to Camila Osorio…

Naomi Osaka showed that she is on the road to recovery from the abdominal injury that forced her out of the…
Cardiff City: Dimitrios Goutas’ future in his own hands – Omer Riza

Cardiff City: Dimitrios Goutas’ future in his own hands…

Goutas was signed by Riza’s predecessor Erol Bulut, joining the same summer as fellow Greek international Manolis Siopis. Siopis left the…
E.C.B. Cuts Interest Rates Again, With an Uncertain Path Ahead

E.C.B. Cuts Interest Rates Again, With an Uncertain Path…

The European Central Bank lowered interest rates on Thursday, the sixth consecutive cut, as the economic landscape for the region rapidly…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *